SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 30

ARUNA SURESH
BRIJ MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
SUNITA – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Tarun Kumar and Mr.J.P.Upadhyay, Advocates.
None.

JUDGMENT

ARUNA SURESH, J. (Oral)

CM No.3615/2009 (for delay in refilling)

1. By way of this application, appellant has sought condonation of delay of 380 days in refilling the appeal. It is averred in the application that appellant had filed the appeal in February 2008 against the judgment and decree of the Trial Court dated 29th November, 2007. Since Registry raised certain objections and sought clarifications of the same, appeal was taken back from the Registry. Appellant pursued refiling of the appeal with his counsel but the appeal could not be filed in time. In December 2008 i.e. after about more than nine months, appellant had engaged another counsel to get the appeal refiled. However, appeal was refiled only on 13th March, 2009 as the new counsel took some time to remove the objections in refiling the appeal. This resulted in delay of 380 days in refiling the appeal.

2. Order XLI Rule 3A CPC enables an appellant to file his appeal after the expiry of period of limitation specified therefor, to be accompanied by an application supported by affidavit setting forth the facts on which the appellant relies on to satisfy the Court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top