S.MURALIDHAR
M. K. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SANGEETA GUPTA – Respondent
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J. - These four petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) arise out of same set of facts and are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment. The prayer in Crl M.C. Nos. 7834-35/2006 and Crl. M.C. No. 8473/2006 is for the quashing of Criminal Complaint No. 946/1/06 titled Smt. Sangeeta Gupta v. Ms. Navneet Kaur and Ors. under Sections 500 and 501 read with Sections 34/120-B, IPC pending in the Court of Mr. Ravinder Singh, learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi insofar as the petitioners are concerned. The prayer in Crl.M.C. Nos. 7836-37/2006 and 8474/2006 is for the quashing of Criminal Complaint No. 281/1/06 titled Smt. Rachita Sharma v. Ms. Navneet Kaur and Ors. under Sections 500 and 501 read with Sections 34/120-B, IPC pending in the Court of Mr. Ravinder Singh, learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM), Patiala House, New Delhi insofar as the petitioners are concerned.
2. The background to the filing of the above complaints is that the parties, i.e., the complainants Sangeeta Gupta and Rachita Sharma and the accused M.K. relevant time, employees of the Electronics and Computer Software
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.