SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 371

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Kedar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Pt. Siri Kishan Thru LRS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. H.C.Sukhija, Mr. Sudhir Sukhija, Advocates
Mr. Vijay Kishan, Mr. Vikram Jetley, Advocate

JUDGMENT

By present petition the petitioners have assailed an order dated 24th April, 2003 of learned Additional Rent Control Tribunal dismissing appeal of the petitioners against the order of Additional Rent Controller and confirming the eviction order passed by Additional Rent Controller under Section 14(1)(a), 14(1)(b) and 14(1)(j) of Delhi Rent Control Act.

2. The Eviction Petition was preferred by Shri Krishan (deceased) landlord against LRs of late Shri Inder Ram (tenant) and against present petitioners under Section 14(1)(b)(j) of DRC Act on following causes of action:

(i) That the respondents have neither paid nor tendered the whole of the arrears of rent due from them and legally recoverable from them inspite of service of notice of demand dated 4.6.1979. The rent has not been paid to the petitioner for the period commencing from 1st October, 69 and a sum of Rs.8025.04 was due to the petitioner from the respondent no.1 to 8 as arrears of rent till the end of May, 1979. A further sum of Rs.899.47 has accrued due from them from 1.6.1979 till 30th June, 1980. Thus a total sum of Rs.8924.51 is due from the respondent no.1 to 8 as arrears of rent.

(ii) That Shri Inder Ram














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top