SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 420

S.K.AGARWAL
AFL Developers – Appellant
Versus
Veena Trivedi – Respondent


Advocates:
R. C. Panigrahi, for Plaintiffs; P. S. Khera, for Defendant.

Judgement

ORDER :- This is an application under Order XI, Rule 11, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short CPC), filed by the defendant, praying for directions, to plaintiff No. 1, to answer the interrogatiories served on him with IA 2729/96. The plaintiff has filed reply opposing the application.

2. Facts necessary for disposal of the above application briefly are: that the plaintiffs filed the suit against the applicant/defendant for perpetual and mandatory injunction, restraining the defendant, her employees, agents, servants etc. from in any manner interfering or causing obstruction in the ingress to and egress from the first floor of the premises No. B-25, Gulmohar Park, New Delhi (for short suit property), as well as for mandatory injunction for directing the defendant to remove iron gates from the space, leading from the ground floor to the first floor of the suit premises. The applicant/defendant filed written statement pleading therein that in the garb of perpetual injunction the plaintiffs are seeking relief of possession; that plaintiff No. 1 is a sham legal entity and (sic) a front to violate and defeat fiscal law and that this company was a proprietary concern of one Mr


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top