SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 520

MOOL CHAND GARG, PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
UOI – Appellant
Versus
BALJIT SINGH SONDHI – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Through:Mr.H.K.Gangwani, Advocate
Through:Mr.K.C.Mittal, Advocate Mr.Rahul Goyal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)

1. This common order shall dispose the aforesaid two writ petitions arising out of the common order dated 12th February 2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal bench in OA Nos.2092/2007 and 520/2008.

2. The learned Tribunal, allowing the OAs, set aside the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority against the applicant i.e. respondent; quashed the inquiry report and the order of disagreement, and ordered to ensue the consequents in law pursuant to such quashing be bestowed upon the applicant/respondent within a period of two months; which required the petitioners to open the sealed cover relating to the DPC held in September 2006 for promotion of the respondent and grant benefits as per the recommendation of the DPC.

3. The respondent when working as Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 10, Kolkata was issued a charge sheet imputing him of misconduct during the period June 1995 to June 1996 with four articles of charge against him, of which the enquiry officer exonerated him of two charges and held that the remaining two were partially proved.

4. The Disciplinary Authority, disagreeing with the findings of the En


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top