SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 623

INDERMEET KAUR
HIRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DELHI WAKF BOARD – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.V.Shukla, Advocate
Mr.Javed Ahmed, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

INDERMEET KAUR, J.

1. This appeal has impugned the judgment and decree dated 4.2.1989 which had endorsed and confirmed the findings of the trial judge dated 25.10.1982 whereby the suit of the plaintiff i.e. of the Delhi Wakf Board had been decreed in its favour.

2. The plaintiff/respondent i.e. Delhi Wakf Board had filed a suit for possession against the defendant Hira Singh. It was alleged that the property in dispute i.e. a mosque at Village Oldenpur, Shahdra bearing No.610/403 is a wakf property and has been used as a wakf since time immemorial. This property has been notified in the notification of gazette on 3.12.1970; subsequently corrected by another notification dated 29.4.1978 published in the Delhi Gazette on 18.5.1978. The defendant's contention that he was in lawful possession of the suit property is liable to be rejected.

3. Defendant had contested the suit. The preliminary objection was that suit was time barred. Property is not a wakf property; the owner of the property Mohd.Ahsaan had sold it to the defendant in the year 1953. The premises in dispute is being used as a Gurdwara and is being managed by the Gurudwara Managing Committee. The earlier































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top