SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 618

INDERMEET KAUR
PADAM CHAND – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Through:Mr.Pravir Kr.Jain, Advocate.
Through:Mr.Girish K. Kaul, Advocate for

JUDGMENT

INDERMEET KAUR, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of two RSAs i.e. (i) RSA No.237/1982 titled as Padam Chand Anr. Vs. Smt.Lakshmi Devi & Ors. & (ii) RSA No.239/1982 titled Padam Chand Vs. Lakhshmi Devi. These second appeals have impugned the judgment and decree dated 17.7.1982 which had set aside the finding of the Trial Judge dated 6.2.1978. Vide judgment and decree dated 6.2.1978, the suit of the plaintiff Lakshmi Devi had been dismissed. The impugned judgment had allowed the appeals whereby Lakshmi Devi was held entitled to a decree. This judgment shall also dispose of four second appeals against the orders of the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) dated 5.1.1982 i.e. (i) RC.S.A.No.45/1982 titled as Phool Chand Vs. Padam Chand, (ii) RC.S.A.No.63/1982 titled as Phool Chand Vs. Padam Chand, (iii) RC.S.A.No.64/1982 titled as Phool Chand Vs. Padam Chand and (iv) RC.S.A.No.65/1982 titled as Phool Chand Vs.Padam Chand. The RCT modified the finding of the Rent Controller dated 30.1.1980 thereby holding that the appellants i.e. Padam Chand Jain and Mahender Kumar are the owners/landlords of the disputed premises. Cross objections of Phool Chand (husband of Lakshmi
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top