SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 716

V.K.JAIN
ROHTAS GOEL – Appellant
Versus
SOMAY NAYAK – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff : Ms Bitika Sharma For the Defendant : None.

JUDGMENT

V.K. JAIN, J

1. This is a suit for permanent injunction and damages. Plaintiff No.1 Rohtas Goel is the Chairman and Managing Director of plaintiff No.2 M/s Omaxe Construction Ltd., which is a company engaged in real estate development and construction of buildings, roads, bridges, malls, shops, etc. It has been alleged that the plaintiffs adopted “Omaxe” as a part of their corporate name and their services in the year 1989 and have been conducting their business activities, using that trade name. The plaintiffs have developed a number of projects, consisting of apartments and villas, including Omaxe Plaza Wedding Mall, Omaxe Green Valley, Omaxe NRI City, Omaxe Arcade, Omaxe Heights and Omaxe City. Omaxe has thus become a well-recognized name in the field of real estate, is a coveted property of the plaintiffs and is entitled to highest degree of protection. The plaintiffs claim to be proprietor of mark “Omaxe” in several classes including class 19, and class 37 (which pertains to building construction; repair and installation services). The registration under class 37 had been applied for when the suit was filed but, is stated to have been granted during pendency of the


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top