V.B.Gupta, J.

Petitioner which is a Government Undertaking and a sick company after getting concurrent adverse findings from the courts below, is bent upon wasting public time and money. Now, it has chosen to file present petition before this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India

2. Before dealing with this petition, it would be necessary to state as to what is the scope of Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Law is well settled that jurisdiction of this Court, under this Article is limited.

3. In Waryam Singh and another vs. Amarnath and another, AIR 1954, SC 215, the court observed; “This power of superintendence conferred by Article 227 is, as pointed out by Harries, C.J., in –Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. V. Sukumar Mukherjee?, AIR 1951 Cal 193 (SB) (B), to be exercised most sparingly and only in appropriate cases in order to keep the Subordinate Courts within the bounds of their authority and not for correcting mere errors.”

4. In light of principles laid down in the above decision, it is to be seen as to whether present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against impugned orders is maintainable or not.

5. In Narain Singh through