SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 808

S.MURALIDHAR
GAURI SHANKER – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Akshay Anand with Ms. Sonam Nagrath and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocates
None.

ORDER

1. Aggrieved by the non-return of 6 kgs of gold and Indian currency amounting to Rs. 1,49,000/- seized from the business premises of the Petitioner on 11th July 2005 by the Officers of the Enforcement Directorate („ED) the Petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

2. The case of the Petitioner is that he is a Director of M/s. J.P. Goel & Sons Pvt. Limited. On 11th July 2005 the business premises of the Petitioner were searched by the Officers of the ED. During the course of search, 6 kgs of gold and Indian currency in the sum of Rs. 1,49,000/- were seized. A copy of the panchnama dated 11th July 2005 has been enclosed. It is submitted that thereafter, despite numerous representations of the Petitioner for release of the gold as well as the Indian currency, there was no response from the ED. The Petitioner contends that the seizure was illegal since Section 3 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 („FEMA Act) permits seizure only of foreign exchange. In other words, it is submitted that officers of the ED had no authority to seize either gold or the Indian currency. Despite the passage of over four and half yea





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top