AJIT BHARIHOKE
KANIKA NARANG NEE PASRICHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE N. C. T. OF DELHI – Respondent
1. Above referred four petitions are filed by the petitioner Kanika Narang Nee Pasricha, seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respective respondents namely Manrich Singh Narang, Ritika Mishra, Jatinder Kour Narang & Rajinder Singh Narang, in the aforesaid petitions, vide order dated 05th February, 2010 in FIR No. 17/2010, P.S. Crime Against Woman Cell under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the impugned order dated 05.02.2010 granting bail to the respondents named above and submitted that on reading of the bail order, it would be seen that it is bereft of reasoning, as such, the order is liable to be quashed. In support of this contention, he has relied upon the judgment of Supreme Court in Gajanand Aggarwal Vs. State of Orissa, 2006 CriLJ 4618 (SC), Brij Nandan Jaiswal Vs. Munna & Ors., 2009 CriLJ 833 (SC) and Puran Vs. Rambila & Ors., 2001 CriLJ 2566 (SC). Learned counsel submitted that perusal of the status report filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Special Police Unit for Women & Children, Nanakpura, New Delhi prima facie, shows the commission of offences under Sections 498A & 406 IPC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.