SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 188

V.K.JAIN
Procter & Gamble Company – Appellant
Versus
Joy Creators – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra with Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advs. For the Defendant: None.

JUDGMENT

V.K. JAIN, J

1. This is a suit for permanent injunction, rendition of accounts, damages and delivery up of the infringing material. The plaintiff is a fortune 500 company, having business operations in 80 countries, dealing in a large number of products and employing 1,38,000/- persons. The plaintiff company is also engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling skin care and personal cleansing products, including anti-aging moisturizer under the trademark OLAY. The plaintiff company is also using the trademarks OLAY TOTAL EFFECTS and TOTAL EFFECTS in respect of anti-aging products. The plaintiff holds registration in respect of trademark OLAY TOTAL EFFECTS in Class 3 of Schedule 4 of Trademarks Act, 1999 in respect of Foundation, Make-up Base, Skin Moisturizing Cream, Lotions and Gels, Skin Whitening Preparations, Facial and Skin Masks, Skin Tonners, Cleansers and Astringents, Eye Masks, Eye Gel Patch, Eye Creams, Lotions and Gels, Skin and Body Massage Creams, Soaps (excluding soaps for fabric use), Perfumeries, Essential Oils, Dentifrices, Shampoo, Conditioners, Hair Styling Preparations, Hair Care Preparations and Hair Colouring Preparations. It also holds regist



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top