SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 538

S.MURALIDHAR
Arvind Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
Central Public Information Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/plaintiff: Prashant Bhushan, Girija Kishan Verma and Rishikesh Kumar, Advs. in W.P. (C) 6614/2008 and C.M. Appl. No. 12685/2008 and S.K. Dubey, Vanshdeep Dalmia and Abhinav Rao, Advs. in W.P. (C) 8999/2008 and 8407 of 2009 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 7517/2008 and 5286/2009
For Respondents/Defendant: S.K. Dubey, Vanshdeep Dalmia and Abhinav Rao, Advs. in W.P. (C) 6614/2008 and C.M. Appl. No. 12685/2008 and Prashant Bhushan, Girija Kishan Verma and Rishikesh Kumar, Advs. in W.P. (C) 8999/2008 and 8407 of 2009 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 7517/2008 and 5286/2009

JUDGMENT

S. Muralidhar, J.

1. A short but interesting question arises for determination in these petitions arising out of an order dated 12th June 2008, passed by the Central Information Commission ('CIC'). That question is whether the information seeker Mr. Arvind Kejriwal can be provided with copies of documents in the files concerning appointments at the levels of Deputy Secretary, Director, Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary in the Government of India without the procedure outlined in Section 11(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 ('RTI Act') having to be followed?

2. The CIC allowed Mr. Kejriwal inspection of the relevant files concerning empanelment of Additional Secretaries and Secretaries to the Government of India and he was to be provided by the Department of Personnel and Training ('DoPT'), Government of India copies of the documents and records, as might be specified by him after inspection. Further, it was held that since Mr. Kejriwal had already been allowed inspection of the files of the appointments of officers in the rank of Deputy Secretary, Director and Joint Secretary, the denial of photocopies of the documents was not justified. These documen



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top