Back
Next 
2009 Supreme(Del) 71
HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI
MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
Hari Singh ... Appellant
versus
State ... Respondent
Crl. A. No. 833/2006
Decided on : January 19, 2009
Advocates Appeared:
Mr.G.P.Thareja, Advocate Mr. Amit Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
Mr.G.P.Thareja, Advocate Mr. Amit Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
The main legal point is not provided in the judgment.
Headnote:
Criminal Procedure - Orders - Legal provision discussed by the court
Fact of the Case:
The fact of the case is not provided in the judgment.
Finding of the Court:
The finding of the court is not provided in the judgment.
Issues: The issues are not provided in the judgment.
Ratio Decidendi: The ratio decidendi is not provided in the judgment.
Final Decision: The final decision is not provided in the judgment.
JUDGMENT
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
SUNIL GAUR, J.
1. For orders, see Crl. M. C. No. 884/2006.
