CM NO. 16542/2010 It is an application for condonation of delay. Having heard Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. R.K. Saini, learned counsel for the respondent, we are inclined to think that sufficient ground exist for condonation of delay and accordingly the same stands condoned. The application is disposed of. LPA No. 662/2010

In this intra-Court appeal, the assail is to the order dated 12th July, 2010 whereby the learned single Judge has extended the benefit of realization of attendance on the ground that the said respondents were on maternity leave. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, learned counsel for the appellants has very fairly stated that he was required to file two appeals but he has filed a composite appeal. Learned counsel has submitted that the learned single Judge has committed an error by making a distinction between the medical leave and maternity leave. He has placed reliance on the Division Bench decision in Sukriti Upadhyay versus University of Delhi (LPA No. 539/2010 decided on 4th October, 2010) wherein this Court after referring to the rules invoked in paragraphs 8 to 12 has held thus:-

“8. Rule 3 of the 1975 Rules reads as follows:

“The student