J.R. MIDHA, J.

1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed the brief note of submissions. However, the learned counsel has utterly failed to address the number of judgments relating to the issues involved. Some of the relevant judgments in this regard to the notice of this Court are Harshad Chiman Lal Modi vs. DLF Universal & Anr., AIR 2005 SC 4446, Shri Sant Singh vs. Shri K.G. Ringshia, CS(OS) No.2011/1984 decided on 24th May, 2010, Splendor Landbase Limited vs. Mirage Infra Limited & Anr., CS(OS) No.582/2009 decided on 8th February, 2010 and Splendor Landbase Limited vs. Mirage Infra Limited & Anr., FAO(OS) No.150/2010 decided on 9th April, 2010.

2. When the Court calls for written arguments to be submitted, it is expected to be something as would assist the Court in its endeavour to do justice and decide the case. Simply filing a list of judgments and attaching photocopies does not assist the Court nor does filing long-winded arguments which are not structured and properly arranged.

3. Written arguments, which Order XVIII Rule 2(3A) of the Code of Civil Procedure also recognizes, ought to be such that would assist the Court. The pattern would vary from case to case bu