SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 134

V.K.JAIN
DIVYA SOOD – Appellant
Versus
RENU BAJAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff: Mr. M.K. Miglani and Mr. Kapil Kumar.
For the Defendant: None.

JUDGMENT

V.K. JAIN, J

1. This is a suit for permanent injunction, rendition of accounts and damages. The plaintiff Ms. Divya Sood, who is carrying business under the name and style M/s THE BODY CARE in engaged in providing beauty and health care services through slimming centres, beauty clinics, spas, etc. The case of the plaintiff is that she began her operation in the year 1997 and is now recognized as the leader in providing beauty and health services, through a team of dedicated and trained professionals, who are acknowledged to be the best trained in the industry. She also claims to be well known for setting up professional and ethical standards and claims reputation as a world-class beauty and health care specialists. She is operating 23 beauty body and health care clinics all over the country with branches in all major Indian cities.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that the mark THE BODY CARE was coined and adopted by her in the year 2000 and since then she has been continuously, uninterruptedly and extensively using the aforesaid mark. She has also applied for the registration of the mark THE BODY CARE and her application was advertised in Trademark Journal on 18th November




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top