SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 39

INDERMEET KAUR
MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
K. P. BANSAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.K. Taneja, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate.
Nemo.

Judgment

INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.326/2011 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. RSA No.3/2011 & C.M.No.325/2011

1. This appeal has impugned the judgment and decree dated 1.11.2010 which has endorsed the finding of the Trial Judge dated 21.4.2009, whereby the suit of the plaintiff, Shri K.P. Bansal, seeking a decree of declaration and mandatory injunction to the effect that his resignation letter dated 18.8.1991 had been obtained under pressure and coercion was decreed in his favour. A decree of declaration was passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant that the said resignation was obtained by force by the defendant; decree for mandatory injunction had also been passed directing the reinstatement of the plaintiff with full back wages and consequential benefits with effect from 18.8.1991. 2. The plaintiff had been selected in the Sanatam DharamSaraswati Bal Mandir School, Punjabi Bagh as a TGT Maths teacher. He worked there for about 12 years. On 18.8.1991, the plaintiff was called to the school and forced to write a letter of resignation. The plaintiff lodged a police complaint dated 24.8.1991. A representation to the Director of Educati




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top