SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 230

MOOL CHAND GARG
BHARAT TEWARI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. B.L. Chawla, Adv.
Mr. S.R. Narayan, Adv.

JUDGMENT

MOOL CHAND GARG, J

1. This appeal arises out of an order dated 27.08.2007 passed by the learned ADJ whereby the Learned Additional District judge after hearing the parties and finding no merit in the Objection Petition filed by the appellant dismissed the objection petition and upheld the award passed by the Arbitrator dated 02.08.2006. The appellant, thus being aggrieved by the order of the Learned Additional District judge has impugned it before us. Hence the present appeal.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are, Appellant was allotted a parking lot at (PRS) Sarojini Nagar Railway Station, New Delhi for a period of two years w.e.f. 1.5.2003 on a payment of a lump sum amount of Rs.14,80,005/-. An agreement to that effect was executed between the parties on 6.5.2003. The parking lot allotted to the appellant consisted of ground accommodation measuring 770 square meters at the existing site at the station. The appellant however alleged that he had deposited four months advance license fee besides a sum of Rs.1,48,000/- towards security with Northern Railway at the station as per terms and conditions of the agreement and therefore now no license fee was due from him.

3.


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top