S. Muralidhar, J.

1. In Writ Petition (Civil) 295 of 2011, the Petitioner challenges an order dated 6th September 2010, passed by the Central Information Commission ('CIC') dismissing his appeal against an order dated 28th April 2010 of the Appellate Authority of the High Court of Delhi under the Right to Information Act, 2005 ('RTI Act') declining to furnish the complete information sought by him in RTI Application No. 184 of 2008.

2. In Writ Petition (Civil) 608 of 2011 the Petitioner challenges the same order insofar as it relates to the dismissal of his Appeal Nos. 314 and 315 dated 13th August 2010 in relation to RTI Application Nos. 35 and 36 of 2010.

Factual matrix

3. The Petitioner was a Member of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service. Pursuant to a Resolution dated 26th August 2008 of the Full Court, a Committee of five Judges of the High Court heard the Petitioner on 29th May 2008 and decided that it was desirable to place him under suspension pending disciplinary action. While disposing of his writ petition challenging the order of suspension, the Supreme Court by an order dated 13th August 2008 directed that the inquiry against the Petitioner may be completed within a p