SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 299

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
V.K. Jain, J.
Appellants: Double Coin Holdings Ltd. and Anr.
Vs.
Respondent: Trans Tyres (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
I.A. No. 548/2011 in CS (OS) No. 89/2011 and I.A. No. 550/2011 in CS (OS) No. 90/2011
Decided On: 20.04.2011

Advocates:
Counsels:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Akhil Sibal, Seema Sundd, Salim Inamdar, Abhiruchi Mengi, Akhil Sachar, Anirudh Wadhwa, Ritika Ahuja and R.N. Karanjawala, Advs. in I.A. No. 548/2011, Pratibha M. Singh, Kapil Wadhwa and Archana Sachdeva, Advs. in I.A. No. 550/2011
For Respondents/Defendant: Pratibha M. Singh, Kapil Wadhwa and Archana Sachdeva, Advs. in I.A. No. 548/2011, Akhil Sibal, Seema Sundd, Salim Inamdar, Abhiruchi Mengi, Akhil Sachar, Anirudh Wadhwa, Ritika Ahuja and R.N. Karanjawala, Advs. inI.A. No. 550/2011

The ownership and goodwill in a trademark vest in the person who first uses the mark on the product.

Headnote:

The Court held that the ownership and goodwill in the trademark Double Coin continues to vest in Double Coin Holdings Ltd. China which has been putting this mark on the tires and tubes manufactured by it and which were also imported and sold in India by Trans Tyres.

Fact of the Case:

Double Coin Holdings Ltd. and ZAFCO Trading LLC filed a suit against Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. and Mr. Harish Kakkad for infringement of trademark and passing off. Double Coin Holdings Ltd. is a Chinese company that owns the trademark Double Coin for tires and tubes. Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. is an Indian company that imports and sells tires and tubes under the Double Coin brand. Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. claimed that it had obtained registration for the Double Coin trademark in India in 2007 with the consent of Double Coin Holdings Ltd. Double Coin Holdings Ltd. denied this and claimed that it had come to know about the registration only in January 2010.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that Double Coin Holdings Ltd. was the first user of the trademark Double Coin in India and that the ownership and goodwill in the trademark continued to vest in Double Coin Holdings Ltd. The Court also found that Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. did not have any legal right to use the trademark Double Coin on any tire or tube that was not manufactured by Double Coin Holdings Ltd. The Court further found that Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. was passing off its goods as those of Double Coin Holdings Ltd. and that this was likely to cause irreparable harm to Double Coin Holdings Ltd.

Issues: 1. Whether Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. had obtained registration for the Double Coin trademark in India with the consent of Double Coin Holdings Ltd.? 2. Whether Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. had any legal right to use the trademark Double Coin on any tire or tube that was not manufactured by Double Coin Holdings Ltd.? 3. Whether Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. was passing off its goods as those of Double Coin Holdings Ltd.?

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the ownership and goodwill in a trademark vest in the person who first uses the mark on the product. The Court also held that a distributor or importer of a product cannot claim ownership or goodwill in the trademark already put on the product imported and/or distributed by him. The Court further held that the use of the trademark by the importer/distributor of the product is deemed to be a use by the manufacturer of the product, who puts his mark on the product. The Court also held that a distributor/importer can claim ownership in the trademark only if he is the first user of that trademark in the concerned territory.

Final Decision: The Court granted an injunction restraining Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. from selling any tire or tube bearing the trademark Double Coin or a mark deceptively similar to the aforesaid mark unless that product has been manufactured by Double Coin Holdings Ltd. China. The Court also stayed further proceedings in the suit till the disposal of the rectification proceedings pending before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).

JUDGMENT

V.K. Jain, J.

1. CS (OS) No. 89/2011 has been filed by Double Coin Holdings Ltd. and ZAFCO Trading LLC against Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd. and Mr. Harish Kakkad whereas CS (OS) No. 90/2011 is the cross suit, the Defendants in CS (OS) No. 89/2011 being the Plaintiff in the suit and the Plaintiffs in CS (OS) 89/2011 being the Defendants in this suit. Double Coin Holdings Ltd. is a Chinese company which owns the trademark Double Coin in respect of tyres etc. and claims that its products are being sold worldwide in as many as 90 countries and ZAFCO Trading LLC (hereinafter referred to as "ZAFCO?) is its authorized agent. Double Coin Holdings Ltd. claims that the trademark Double Coin was adopted by it in the year 1930 and it started producing tyres in the year 1934. It claims to be manufacturing radial tyres for trucks, buses and automobiles since 1960s. It also claims to have manufacturing capacity of more than 6 million units and production of 2.7 million truck and bus tyres in a year. It is also stated that 40% of the production of the company is being exported to more than 60 countries including India. It is claimed by Double Coin Holdings Ltd that on account of continuous and widespread use of the trademark Double Coin coupled with large scale advertisements, the aforesaid mark has come to be associated exclusively with this company and this mark is registered in its name in several countries including USA, China, Dubai, Brazil and various other countries. The company claims turnover of Rs. 22 crores, 25 crores, 30 crores, 34 crores and 38 crores in the year 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively in India alone. It also claims to have incurred advertisement expenses of Rs. 33 lakhs, 37.5 lakhs, 45 lakhs, 51 lakhs and 57 lakhs respectively during the aforesaid years.

2. The case of the Plaintiffs in CS (OS) No. 89/2011 is that Double Coin Holdings Ltd has been supplying tyres to various dealers in India including Trans Tyres (India) Private Ltd through ZAFCO since the year 2005. ZAFCO also claims pan world presence covering more than 85 countries with a huge distributorship database. It is alleged that ZAFCO had appointed Trans Tyres (India) Pvt. Ltd. as its authorized representative and distributor vide agreement dated 1st July, 2006, which was valid till 30th June, 2007 but was not renewed thereafter.

3. The trademark Double Coin has been registered in India in the name of Trans Tyres (India) Pvt. Ltd. in respect of tyres and tubes since 31st October, 2007. The case of the Plaintiffs in Suit No. 89/2010 is that they came to know about this registration only in January, 2010 when Plaintiff No. 2 ZAFCO started its operation in India and established a branch office at Barakhamba Road, New Delhi for sale and marketing of Double Coin Tyres being manufactured by Double Coin Holdings Ltd. The Defendants in CS (OS) No. 89/2011 have also applied for registration of trademark in Class 4, 9 and 12 in respect of all kind of industrial oils, greases and lubricants, automotive electric batteries and batteries for electric vehicles, all kinds of vehicle rims (steel & alloy wheel rims). A cease and desist notice was issued by the Plaintiffs in CS (OS) No. 89/2011 to the Defendants in that suit. In their reply, the Trans Tyres (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Harish Kakkad claimed that they had obtained registration with the consent of the Plaintiff and to its full knowledge. A petition filed by the Plaintiffs in CS (OS) No. 89/2011 for cancellation of the trademark obtained by Trans Tyres (India) Pvt. Ltd. is stated to be pending before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB). The Plaintiffs in this suit have sought injunction restraining the Defendants in the suit from manufacturing, selling or advertising any goods or services using the trademark Double Coin or any other mark identical with or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs? mark and holding themselves out as owners of the mark Double Coin. They hav













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top