SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 621

MUKTA GUPTA
JASVINDEDR SAINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.N. Sharma, Mr. Manish Kr. Singh, Advs.
Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI Pardeep Dahiya, PS Nangloi.

Judgment

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. FIR No. 765/2007 was registered against the Petitioners for offences punishable under Section 498A/304B/406/34 IPC on the death of one Ms. Chandni on a complaint lodged by her father Shri Ajay Gautam. After completion of investigation charge-sheet was filed for offences punishable under Section 498A/304B/406/34 IPC against Petitioner Nos.1 to 4. Subsequently, on the formal arrest of Petitioner Nos. 5 to 8 supplementary charge-sheet was filed for offences under Section 498A/304B/406/302 IPC. The matter was heard for framing of charge, and vide order dated 18th March, 2009 Learned Additional Sessions Judge held that there was prima facie evidence of offences punishable under Section 498A/304B/34 IPC against the Petitioners and thus directed framing of the charges. Vide this order the Learned Additional Sessions Judge also held that there was no material evidence for framing of charge under Section 302 IPC against the accused persons. The trial continued and as many as 18 witnesses were examined. On 22nd November, 2010 the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajbir @ Raju & Anr. Vs. State of Haryana SLP No. 9507/2010 directed as under: “We further direct all tri
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top