VEENA BIRBAL, BADAR DURREZ AHMED
CIT – Appellant
Versus
GENPACT INDIA – Respondent
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
1. These appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) have been preferred by the Revenue in respect of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s orders dated 13.10.2009 and 04.03.2011 in ITA Nos 2170/DEL/2009 and 5556/DEL/2010, respectively. Both these appeals have been admitted and the common question arising in these appeals is as under:-
“Whether ITAT erred in directing that assessing officer to exclude communication expenses out of Total Turnover for computing eligible deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”
2. ITA No.1519/2010 as well as ITA No.1076/2011, are both in respect of the assessment year 2004-05. ITA No.1519/2010 arises out of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax in exercise of his powers under Section 263 of the said Act. The assessing officer in the original assessment had not included the communication expenses in the figure of total turnover for computing the eligible deduction under Section 10A of the said Act nor any inquiry to that effect had been made by the assessing officer. Consequently, the Commissioner of Income Tax, in exercise of his powers under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.