SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 53

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
RATI RAM – Appellant
Versus
D. C. M. SHRORAM CONSOLIDATD LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Adv.
None.

Judgment

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is to the impugned judgment of the Trial Court dated 30.9.2002. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of advance tailoring charges which were paid to the appellant/defendant. By the impugned judgment the counter claim which was filed by the appellant/defendant was also dismissed.

2. The facts of the case are that parties entered into an agreement dated 30.7.1976 whereby the appellant/defendant was appointed as a tailoring contractor for executing the work as stated in the schedule annexed with the agreement. The original agreement was for one year from 2.8.1976 to 31.7.1977, and whereafter, it was firstly extended for a period of 6 months and thereafter there were two extensions of 2 months each. The last extension of one month expired on 30.4.1998. The terms and conditions for all the agreements remained the same as were found in the first agreement dated 30.7.1976. A total sum of Rs.14,70,459.08 was paid to the appellant/defendant by the respondent/plainti










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top