SURESH KAIT
AJAY GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER – Respondent
1. The instant petition is being filed against the impugned order dated 16.08.2011, whereby, notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. has been framed against the petitioner.
2. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner has sought to set aside the Notice dated 16.08.2011 and consequent proceedings thereof for the offences punishable under Section 135 of the Electricity Act.
3. Ld. counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the complaint, the petitioner and Deepika Mittal (Registered Consumer) were made respondent/accused. In the said complaint the allegations made against the petitioner in para 3 is reproduced as under:-
“3 That there is no other electricity connection installed at the said property of the petitioner, but the complainant has been wrongly alleging and sending bills in respect of the connection having “K. No. 2541C3240137”, when at the time of the purchase of the said property the petitioner did not find any such connection working at the said property.”
4. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/accused wife had purchased the property bearing No.D-819, New Friends colony, New Delhi, in July, 2003 and the petitioner found installed onl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.