SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 1666

M.L.MEHTA
Durga Prasad Ray – Appellant
Versus
Meenu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Petitioner:Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Rajiv Bajaj, Advocates.

Judgment :-

M.L. MEHTA, J. (Oral)

1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 04.02.2012 passed by ld. Judge-Family Courts in H.M.A. No.87/2010 whereby interim maintenance @ Rs. 10,000/-p.m. and litigation expenses @ Rs. 15,000/-were awarded to the respondent while disposing the application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (herein after referred to as ‘Act’) filed by the respondent.

2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 02.11.1999 at Delhi and a girl and a boy were born from the wedlock. The petitioner filed a divorce petition against the respondent under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Act. Consequently the respondent moved an application under Section 24 of the Act. Taking into account the fact that the petitioner is working as Chief Medical Officer at Hindu Rao Hospital and it was his responsibility to maintain his wife and female child who resides with her, the ld. Judge passed the impugned order granting maintenance and litigation expenses to the respondent.

3. The impugned order has been assailed by the petitioner on the ground that the respondent is working as senior nu






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top