SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Sukhmohinder Singh Sandhu – Appellant
Versus
Cbi – Respondent
(1) These four Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed by four accused persons facing trial before the learned Sessions Judge under section 342, 365 and 120-B IPC. The petitioners have assailed order dated 1st April, 2010 dismissing their applications under section 91 Cr. P.C., filed for directions to CBI to supply certain documents and statements allegedly in possession of CBI.
(2) The petitioners/accused persons are police officials against whom this FIR was registered at the instance of High Court of Punjab and Haryana and investigation was handed over to CBI. Accused Sumedh Singh Saini was, at that time, SSP Ludhiana. It was alleged by the complainant that he had enmity with owner of M/s Saini Motors and during his tenure as SSP, a number of cases were registered against the owner and other family members of M/s Saini Motors. Local police while conducting investigation of FIR No. 22 of 1994 found that there are business transactions between M/s Saini Motors and Walia family. So, local police roped in Walia family also along with Saini Motors in many criminal cases. Vinod Kumar and Ashish Kumar were members of Walia family. Vinod Kumar and Ashish Kumar filed pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.