SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 197

A.K.PATHAK
Mahalaxmi Embroidery – Appellant
Versus
Shivam Devansh Fab. Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Manik Arora, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Alamgir, Advocate.

Judgment :-

A.K. PATHAK, J.

1. By way of present petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, petitioner has prayed that the order dated 28th July, 2010 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, whereby it has been held that the courts at Delhi had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint, be set aside.

2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the petitioner had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) before Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi. It was alleged therein that the complainant (petitioner) was a proprietorship firm, having its registered office at Delhi and works at Faridabad, Haryana. Petitioner was engaged in the embroidery business. Respondent got various jobs of embroidery done from the petitioner at Faridabad, Haryana from time to time. In discharge of its liability, respondent tendered cheque bearing No. 465488 dated 23rd April, 2010 amounting to Rs.45,551/- drawn on Indian Overseas Bank, Faridabad, Haryana. The said cheque was deposited by the petitioner with its banker, i.e., Syndicate Bank, Khan Market, New Delhi on 24th April, 2010 for encashment. How









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top