DELHI HIGH COURT
(R. N. AGGARWAL AND MALIK SHARIF-UD-DIN, JJ.
JAGAT SINGH AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE
Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 1983,
Decided on : 26-4-1984.
CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302, 304, 324, 326 OF IPC - MURDER - CAUSING GRIEVOUS INJURY - INTERPRETATION OF TOOTH AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR CUTTING - SENTENCING.
Fact of the Case:
Kehri, Jagat Singh, Subh Ram, and Suresh were accused of murdering Chand Ram and causing grievous and simple injuries to Lal Chand and Sundho Devi, respectively. The incident occurred due to a quarrel over a television show. The accused were tried, and Jagat Singh and Subh Ram were convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Kehri and Suresh were acquitted of murder but Suresh was found guilty of causing grievous injury to Lal Chand.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The medical evidence corroborated the testimony of the eyewitnesses, and the statement of Sundho Devi, made shortly after the incident, was found to be reliable. The court held that the accused had intended to cause death, and their act of twisting Chand Ram's neck resulted in his death. However, the court found that the offense fell under Part II of Section 304 of the Penal Code, as it could not be conclusively established that the accused intended to kill Chand Ram.
Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. Whether the accused intended to kill Chand Ram. 3. Whether the offense fell under Section 302 or Section 304 of the Penal Code. 4. Whether tooth is an instrument for cutting within the meaning of Section 324 of the Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt based on the medical evidence, eyewitness testimony, and the statement of Sundho Devi. 2. The court found that the accused had the knowledge that their act of twisting Chand Ram's neck was likely to cause death, but it could not be conclusively established that they intended to kill him. 3. The court held that the offense fell under Part II of Section 304 of the Penal Code, as the accused did not have the intention to kill Chand Ram. 4. The court held that tooth is an instrument for cutting within the meaning of Section 324 of the Penal Code, as it can cause disfiguration of the face.
Final Decision: The court converted the conviction of Jagat Singh and Subh Ram from Section 302 to Section 304, Part II, and sentenced them to four years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2000. The court upheld the conviction of Suresh for causing grievous injury under Section 326 and directed him to pay a fine of Rs. 2000 in lieu of the unexpired period of his sentence.
R. N. Aggarwal, J.: - Kehri along with his three sons, namely, Jagat Singh, Subh Ram and Suresh were sent up for trial on the charge of murdering Chand Ram and further causing grievous and simple injuries respectively, to Lal Chand and Sundho Devi wife of Chand Ram. Lal Chand is the brother of Chand Ram. The learned Additional Sessions Judge who tried the case found Jagat Singh and Subh Ram guilty of the offence of murdering Chand Ram and sentenced each of them to imprisonment for life. Kehri and Suresh were given benefit of doubt and acquitted of the charge of murder. Suresh, however, was found guilty of the offence of causing grievous injury to Lal Chand and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one and a quarter years and a fine of Rs. 250/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. The remaining accused were acquitted of the charges under Ss. 326 and 323 of the Penal Code. Two separate appeals have been preferred one by Jagat Singh and Subh Ram (Crl Appeal No. 177 of 1983) and the second by Suresh (Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 1983). This judgment shall dispose of both the appeals.
2. The accused party with their families, the deceased Chand Ram with his wife and four children and Lal Chand resided in the same locality in village Shahpur Garhi. The house of Lal Chand adjoined the house of his brother Chand Ram. The house of the accused is the third house from the house of Chand Ram. Adjoining the house of the accused is the house of Kewal (brother of Kehri).
3. Kewal Singh has a television set at his house. On 20th June 1981 at about 8 P.M. Sundho, her children, Jagat Singh accused and some others were watching the television. According to P. W. 7 Sundho Devi, her children laughed on a comical scene and this was not liked by Jagat Singh, and he rebuked the children of Sundho in filthy language. Sundho objected to Jagat Singh abusing her children. According to Jagat Singh accused on a dirty scene (probably meaning sexy scene) the children of Sundho laughed and Jagbir Singh son of Lal Chand shouted and that he rebuked Jagbir Singh and told him that it was family place and he should not shout in that manner and he turned out Jagbir from there and on that Sundho Devi started talking loudly in favour of Jagbir and that Sundho also was turned out of the house by the other women who were watching the television. The said small incident flared up and attracted to the spot Lal Chand and the other accused and there was grappling between the accused and Lal Chand. The prosecution case is that in the said grappling Suresh bit the right ear of Lal Chand. P. Ws Ram Mehar and Baldev Singh intervened and separated the two parties. Lal Chand and Sundho Devi went to their home.
4. On next day in the morning at about 8.30 a.m. according to Sundho Devi all the accused armed with lathis came to their home shouting that they would take revenge for the last evening's incident. Sundho bolted the door of her house from inside. All the accused went away. At about 10. a.m. Sundho Devi, her husband Chand Ram and Lal Chand left their house for the police station Narela to lodge a report. When they reached the bus-stop of the village, it is alleged, all the accused armed with lathis came and attacked Chand Ram, Lal Chand and Sundho Devi. Kehri gave two lathi blows, one on the head and the other at the back of Chand Ram. Suresh gave lathi blows on the hand and the right shoulder of Sundho Devi. Kehri also gave two lathi blows - one on the head and the other on the back of Lal Chand. The prosecution case further is that Subh Ram and Suresh caught Chand Ram and fell him on the ground. Jagat Singh sat on the chest and both Jagat Singh and Subh Ram twisted the neck of Chand Ram. Jagdish PW also happened to reach the spot and he raised alarm, on that it is said that the accused ran away. Lal Chand, Sundho and Jagdish took Chand Ram in a DTC bus to the Civil Dispensary at Narela. P. W. 18 Dr. Nigam i
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.