SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 163

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The appellant Vijay alias Hanuman was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. one lac in default of payment of which to undergo further RI for two years for being in illegal and unauthorised possession of 41 grams of charas.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that on 8-4-90 at about 8.30 p.m., while ASI Hazari Lal (PW 3), was on patrol duty along with Constable Kirpal Singh and Kanihya Lal, received a secret information to the effect that one person was selling charas near B-Block, Raghubir Nagar. Acting upon this information, a raiding party was organized. Since public persons refused to join the raiding party, ASI Hazari Lal (PW 3) accompanied by Constables Kanhiya Lal (PW 5) and Kirpal Singh (PW 2) proceeded to B-III Block Raghubir Nagar and apprehended the appellant. Immediately thereafter Constable Kirpal Singh (PW 2) went to inform SHO, Rajinder Singh (PW 6) over phone. On the information received at about 9.05 p.m. SHO (PW 6) arrived





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top