SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 231

High Court of Delhi
A.K. SIKRI & RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, JJ.
Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group
Versus
Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Another
W.P.(C) NO. 7802 OF 2011 & CM No.20148 of 2011
Decided on : 27-01-2012

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ashok Agarwal, Ms. Kusum Agarwal, Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R1, Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, R2, Ms. Shobha Gupta with Ms. Hema Shekhawat, Advocates.

Headnote:

Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 3 (1), 11, 12, 16 & 22 - Public Interest Litigation - Law of Education - Entry level in Pre school - Promotion from pre school to next year - Where Pre-school education is imparted, it has to be treated as entry level and entry level would not start from Pre Primary in respect of such schools - Children admitted at Pre-school at the age of 3+ will get promotion to Pre Primary in the next year and for that, they will not have to undergo the admission process all over again - However, in those schools where there is no Pre-school level, it would be the Pre Primary which would be treated as entry level where admission is to be given to the children at the age of 4+.

Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 3 (1), 11, 12, 16 & 22 - Public Interest Litigation - Law of Education - Right ECCE education quality - Responsibility of government and Private school - Every child has a right to ECCE of equitable quality and when ECCE is treated as first step in educational ladder and as a part of Education For All (EFA), the Government as well as schools have responsibility for all programs for children of 3+ age as well, which is integral part of ECCE. - 3 to 5+ is one stage before child enters class 1 at the age of 6 - This sub-stage of 3 to 5+ includes Pre-School as well as Pre Primary and is clubbed together.

Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 3 (1), 11, 12, 16 & 22 - Public Interest Litigation - Law of Education - Guide lines of ECCE - Admission criterion - Welfare of children - Subjecting the parents and children to double admission test would not only work against the welfare of the children - It would be counter-productive and may have serious psychological and other repercussions on the children - At Pre-school level, there should not be any admission criterion and all those who approach be given admission, this suggestion may be relevant for those institutions having only nursery/ kindergarten/Montessori etc. but is totally impractical for the schools which have primary and/or senior level education as well - for proper and effective implementation of ECCE, the private schools have equal role and duty to play as the Government schools - There is no any reason to keep Pre-school apart and segregated by those regular schools where Pre-school facilities exist and admission starts from that stage - Children are not to be burdened with any textbooks or home works - This part of school may be treated as nursery, Montessori, kindergarten, play school, etc - Specific curriculum framework for ECCE must be kept in mind.

Judgment :-

A.K. SIKRI, J.

1. In this petition filed by the petitioner, categorizing the same as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner complains about the following purported failures on the part of Respondent No.1, Government of NCT of Delhi:

(i) Failure to prevent unaided recognized private schools of Delhi from admitting children below 4 years age in formal schools.

(ii) Failure to ensure that all unaided recognized private schools in Delhi have only one year of pre primary class in formal schools where children of 4+ age are admitted directly and are not promoted from nursery/pre-school.

(iii) Failure to ensure that children admitted in pre primary classes are not burdened with bags and books.

(iv) Failure to start pre primary classes in all schools.

(v) Failure to frame guidelines in regard to pre-school in terms of Clause 21 of the Recognized Schools (Admission Procedure for Pre Primary Class) Order – 2007. It is the submission of petitioner that the aforesaid failures and inaction on the part of Respondent No.1 violates the fundamental right of the children as guaranteed to them under Articles 14, 15, 21 and 21A of the Constitution of India. It is also termed as violative of Articles 38 and 39 of the Constitution as well as provisions of Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the RTE Act) and UN Convention Rights of Child, 1989.

2. The genesis of the controversy raised in this writ petition can be traced to the exercise which started pursuant to earlier writ petition being W.P. No. 12490/2006 filed by this very petitioner, exercise done by the Government pursuant to orders passed therein culminating in the final orders dated 26th September, 2007 and certain events which have taken place thereafter. It is now time to recapitulate all these events in brief to appreciate the cause of aforesaid grievances.

3. Writ Petition No.12490/2006 was filed by the petitioner highlighting the fact that different unrecognized private schools in Delhi were applying different age criteria for admission of children in nursery class and sought directions from this Court to the Government to ensure that all the schools follow uniform age criteria in accordance with Section 16 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 which provides that a child who has not attained the age of 5 years shall not be admitted in class 1 in a recognized school. Taking cognizance of the vital issue raised by the petitioner in the said writ petition, this Court constituted Ashok Ganguly Committee to look into the matter and submit its report, inter alia, ascertaining as to what should be the suitable age for a child for the purpose of admission in pre-primary. The Ashok Ganguly Committee undertook the job with alacrity and after in-depth analysis of all the facets of the issue raised on the basis of various inputs provided by experts from different fields, submitted its report dated 31st march, 2007 with certain recommendations to the Respondent No.1. Copy of the Ashok Ganguly Report is annexed with this petition. This report is in five chapters with following headings:

(i) Chapter I – Introduction.

(ii) Chapter II – Present Position and some Policy Perspective.

(iii) Chapter III – Feedback from stakeholders.

(iv) Chapter IV – The Rationale.

(v) Chapter V – Recommendations.

Along with the Report, there is one annexure also which stipulates ?Some Guidelines for Pre Primary and Pre School Education. Some of the portions of the said report which were highlighted by the counsel for the parties are reproduced at this stage itself:

“REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PRE-PRIMARY AND PRE SCHOOL EDUCATION IN DELHI Chapter – I

Introduction

1.1 Early Childhood Care and Education has globally been recognized as critical for human resource development. The first 8 years of a child‘s life are the most crucial years because during this period of early childhood the pace of development is e










































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top