SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 309

G.P.MITTAL
Bandana – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Manish Maini, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R3-Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

G.P. MITTAL, J

1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.4,89,488/-for the death of Prem Chand Chaurasia, who was aged about 24 years at the time of the accident, which took place on 16.11.2008.

2. The Appellants preferred a Petition on the basis of the structured formula as given in the Second Schedule under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act (the Act). The deceased’s income was claimed to be Rs.40,000/-per annum. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (the Claims Tribunal) accepted the said income as the minimum wages of an unskilled worker on the date of the accident were more than the amount of Rs.40,000/-. The Claims Tribunal deducted one-third towards the personal and living expenses and applied the multiplier of ‘18’ as per the Second Schedule to arrive at the loss of dependency of Rs.4,79,988/-. The Claims Tribunal further awarded notional sum of Rs.9,500/-towards the non-pecuniary damages to arrive at the figure of Rs.4,89,488/-. It held that the deceased himself contributed to the accident to the extent of 25% because he was walking after consuming alcohol on a public road at night time. The compensation was thus reduced to Rs.3,67,116/-.

3. The lea












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top