INDERMEET KAUR, J.

1. The impugned judgment is dated 04.01.2011; the eviction petition filed by the landlord Anil Kumar Bahl against his tenant Bata India Ltd seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of bonafide requirement as contained in Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA) had been decreed; the application seeking leave to defend filed by the tenant had been dismissed.

2. Record shows that the present eviction petition has been filed by the landlord who is a resident of B-127/2, DDA Flat, East of Kailash, New Delhi. The premises in dispute is a shop bearing municipal No. XV/4745, abadi of main bazaar, Paharganj Masjid, New Delhi. The tenant is in occupation of these premises for commercial purpose at the monthly rent of Rs.1,200/-per month. The petitioner is stated to be an employee of a bank; he has three daughters of whom two are professionally qualified and have qualified entrepreneur skills; the second daughter although professionally qualified is yet unemployed; the premises are required bonafide by the petitioner to provide infrastructure to his daughter to start her own business; further contention being that there is no other premises avail