G.P.MITTAL
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Kumar – Respondent
G. P. MITTAL, J.
1. These two Appeals preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited arise out of a common judgment dated 14.07.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal).
2. MAC APP.700/2010 relates to the grant of compensation of Rs.70,000/-to the first Respondent for having suffered injuries in an accident which occurred on 3.02.2005.
3. In MAC APP.701/2010 a compensation of Rs.24,63,024/-was awarded to Respondents No.1 to 5 who were the legal representatives of deceased Satbir who was working as a Head Constable in Delhi Police at the relevant time.
4. During the course of arguments, a very short submission has been made on behalf of the Appellant.
5. It is urged that second Respondent Sanjeev @ Bobby (the driver) in MAC APP.700/2010 and sixth Respondent in MAC APP.701/2010 did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident. At the time of registration of the case under Section 279/338/304-A IPC, the driver was also challaned for driving the vehicle without a licence.
6. During the course of inquiry, the driver came out with a plea that he did not possess a driving licence as he was working only as a helper on RTV bear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.