PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, PRATIBHA RANI
Satyender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gulab Singh – Respondent
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
1. We preface our decision by extracting certain pertinent observations made by the Supreme Court in the decision reported as 2010 (2) SCC 114 Dalip Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.:
1. For many centuries, Indian society cherished two basic values of life i.e., 'Satya' (truth) & 'Ahimsa' (non-violence). Mahavir, Gautam Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi guided the people to ingrain these values in their daily life. Truth constituted an integral part of justice delivery system which was in vogue in pre-independence era and the people used to feel proud to tell truth in the courts irrespective of the consequences. However, post-independence period has seen drastic changes in our value system. The materialism has over-shadowed the old ethos and the quest for personal gain has become so intense that those involved in litigation do no hesitate to take shelter of falsehood, misrepresentation and suppression of facts in the court proceedings. In last 40 years, a new creed of litigants has cropped up. Those who belong to this creed do not have any respect for truth. They shamelessly resort to falsehood and unethical means for achieving their goals. In order to meet the
2010 (2) SCC 114 Dalip Singh V State of U.P. & ors.
Hari Narain v Badri Das AIR 1963 SC 1558 Civ Writ No.376/1973
Gulab Singh & ors. v DDA & ors. AIR 1971 SC 2320
Hatti Singh v Sunder [(2006) 5 SCC 353
Prem Singh & ors. v Birbal & ors] 2009 (12) SCC 101
Prem Singh & ors. v Birbal & ors. AIR 2006 SC 3608 (1995) 1 SCC 198
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.