SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 2024

P.K.BHASIN
Ridhima Juneja – Appellant
Versus
Deven Juneja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Rohit Bhardwaj, Ms. Prerna Mehta, Samrat Nigam, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

P.K.BHASIN, J.

1. Both these petitions arose out of a complaint case under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005( in short ‘the Act of 2005) though were filed against different orders of the trial Court and the appellate Court. Since both the petitions were heard together and common submissions were advanced at the Bar by the counsel for the parties the same are being disposed of together by this common order.

2. The facts, in brief, leading to the filing of these petitions may be noticed at the outset. The petitioner in Crl/M.C.No.2748/10 (reference to whom shall now onwards be made as ‘the petitioner-wife’) and respondent no. 1 in that petition and who is the petitioner in Crl.Rev.P.No.148/098(who shall hereinafter be referred to as ‘the respondent-husband’) were married on 31st January, 2004. They celebrated their honeymoon in Australia, New Zealand and Thailand and on 2nd November, 2005 they were blessed with a son. However, the sweetness of their married life did not last long and within short time relations between them became bitter and so bitter that the petitioner-wife had to file a criminal complaint in Court in the year 2007 unde


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top