HIGH COURT OF DELHI
S. RAVINDRA BHAT & S.P. GARG, JJ.
State (G.N.C.T.) Of Delhi
Versus
Saqib Rehman @ Masood & Others
CRL. L.P. 234 OF 2011, CRL. M.A. 5649, 5650 & 5651 OF 2011
Decided On : 01-08-2012
TERRORIST ACTIVITIES - OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 307/353/186/489(c)/482/120B/34 IPC, SECTION 25/27 ARMS ACT & SECTION 3/5 EXPLOSIVES ACT - The judgment discusses the charges for committing offences punishable under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act, and Explosives Act. The court highlighted the false encounter projected by the police officers and the innocent accused framed in a false criminal case. The Trial Court directed an appropriate inquiry against the police officers and ordered the Commissioner of Police to initiate an inquiry against them under Sections 166, 193, and 195 IPC. The State challenged the findings of the Trial Court, but the High Court found various discrepancies, contradictions, and inconsistencies in the statements of the witnesses, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution alleged that the accused were involved in terrorist activities and were about to strike in Delhi, Gurgaon, and other satellite towns. The police laid a trap and arrested the accused, recovering arms, ammunition, and fake currency from their possession. However, the accused alleged that the encounter was fake and they were kept in illegal detention.
Finding of the Court:
The Trial Court found the encounter to be false and projected by the police officers. It acquitted all the accused and directed an inquiry against the police officers involved. The High Court upheld the findings of the Trial Court, highlighting various discrepancies and inconsistencies in the statements of the witnesses.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the authenticity of the encounter, the recovery of arms and ammunition, and the conduct of the police officers involved in the investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and various discrepancies and inconsistencies in the evidence led to the acquittal of the accused. The court also highlighted the conduct of the police officers and directed an inquiry against them.
Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the leave to appeal petition, upholding the findings of the Trial Court and acquitting the accused. It also noted that the observations and directions made by the Trial Court in the impugned judgment had been taken care of in the writ petitions filed by the aggrieved police officers.
S.P.GARG, J.
1. The State has preferred the petition for leave against the judgment dated 02.02.2011of learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No.24/2010 by which the Respondents were acquitted of the charges for committing the offences punishable under Sections 307/353/186/489(c)/482/120B/34 IPC, under Section 25/27 Arms Act & under Section 3/5 Explosives Act.
2. Case of the prosecution is that in June, 2005, SI Ravinder Kumar Tyagi posted in the office of Special Staff, South-West District, Delhi received a secret information that Masood and Zahid involved in terrorist activities had made their base in Delhi and were about to strike in Delhi, Gurgaon and other satellite towns. This information was recorded as DD No.6 dated 27.06.2005 in the office of the Special Staff. On 01.07.2005 at 10:30 P.M. SI Ravinder Kumar Tyagi on receipt of secret information that Masood and Zahid along with their two associates were about to come to Delhi at 12:30 A.M. from Gurgaon in a blue Tata Indica Car bearing No.HR-26-S-0440 and were in possession of heavy arms and ammunition, formed a raiding party consisting of SI Raj Kumar, ASI Charan Singh, ASI Nirakar Sharma, HC Raj Kumar, HC Ombir Singh, Ct.Surender Singh, Ct.Vinay, Ct.Dinesh Kumar, Ct.Raja Ram, Ct.Zafar Khan, Ct.Kishan, Ct.Sanjy Singh, Ct.Rohtash, Ct.Santraj and Ct.(Driver) Suresh and laid a trap at Gurgaon Delhi Road near NH-8 & Rajokri Crossing at about11:30 P.M. It is further alleged that about 12:45 A.M. a blue colour Tata Indica Car No.HR-26S-0440 was seen coming from Gurgaon Road and when it failed to stop despite a signal, the police chased and forced it to stop near Randhawa Farm House. Accused Saqib Rehman @ Masood, sitting on the front seat of the car immediately came out and fired two rounds at the police party with a pistol. SI Ravinder Tyagi fired one round in turn from his service revolver. He and Constable Vinay snatched the pistol from Saqib Rehman. The accused Nazir Ahmed Sofi @ Doctor, who was on the driver’s seat exhorted Saquib Rehman to shoot at the police party but was overpowered by ASI Nirakar Sharma. The accused Gulam Moinuddin Dar sitting behind tried to remove pin of the handgrenade but was overpowered by Constable Surender Singh; he snatched the handgrenade from his hands. The accused Bhashir Ahmed Shah @ Basir exhorted Gulam Moinuddin Dar to hurl the handgrenades at the police but was overpowered by Head Constable Raj Kumar.
3. The pistol recovered from Saqib Rehman contained four live rounds of 7.62 bore loaded in the magazine and one live round in the pistol chamber. The police seized two cartridges fired by Saqib Rehman @ Masood. In the personal search of Nazir Ahmed Sofi, 12 live cartridges of 7.62 bore were recovered. Head Constable Raj Kumar recovered 35 bullets of AK-47 assault rifle from the right pocket of the pant of Bashir Ahmed Shahs’ trouser. SI Ravinder Tyagi prepared a rukka and sent it to the P.S.Kapasahera for registering the FIR. FIR No.146/2005 was accordingly registered at PS Kapasahera at 4:33 A.M. for the aforesaid offences. SI Mahender Singh along with Ct.Surender Singh of PS Kapasahera reached the spot and conducted necessary proceedings. On search of Tata Indica vehicle, a briefcase containing an Army Combat Uniform and fake currency notes of Rs.50,000/-were recovered. In the personal search of Gulam Moinuddin Dar @ Zahid, a sketch of Palam Air Force Station was recovered from his pant pocket. The I.O. arrested all the four accused and recorded their disclosure statements.
4. During investigation, it transpired that the four accused had been staying in Hotel Baba Continental, Saraswati Marg, Karol Bagh, Delhi. A team lead by ASI Charan Singh along with the accused Saqib Rehman and Gulam Moinuddin Dar was sent to Srinagar and another team lead by SI Mahender Singh, with accused Bashir Ahmed Shah and Nazir Ahmed Sofi was sent to Patna, Bihar, for arrest of the co-accused and recovery of arms/ammunition etc. The team lead by A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.