S.P.GARG, J.

1. The State has preferred the petition for leave against the judgment dated 02.02.2011of learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No.24/2010 by which the Respondents were acquitted of the charges for committing the offences punishable under Sections 307/353/186/489(c)/482/120B/34 IPC, under Section 25/27 Arms Act & under Section 3/5 Explosives Act.

2. Case of the prosecution is that in June, 2005, SI Ravinder Kumar Tyagi posted in the office of Special Staff, South-West District, Delhi received a secret information that Masood and Zahid involved in terrorist activities had made their base in Delhi and were about to strike in Delhi, Gurgaon and other satellite towns. This information was recorded as DD No.6 dated 27.06.2005 in the office of the Special Staff. On 01.07.2005 at 10:30 P.M. SI Ravinder Kumar Tyagi on receipt of secret information that Masood and Zahid along with their two associates were about to come to Delhi at 12:30 A.M. from Gurgaon in a blue Tata Indica Car bearing No.HR-26-S-0440 and were in possession of heavy arms and ammunition, formed a raiding party consisting of SI Raj Kumar, ASI Charan Singh, ASI Nirakar Sharma, HC Raj Kumar, HC Ombir S