M.L.MEHTA
R. Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent
M.L. MEHTA, J.
1. The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 25.02.2012, of the learned Special Judge, CBI whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 219 and 220 CrPC for a joint trial of FIR no. RC No. 1(A)/ 2010/ ACU-IX under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) Prevention of Corruption Act (hereinafter referred to as the “PC Act”) and FIR no. RC No. CBI/ ACU IX/ N.D. 3(A)/ 2009 under Section 7, 8, 12, r/w 13(2) PC Act & 13(1)(d) of PC Act r/w Section 120-B IPC registered with Police Station CBI/ ACU-IX/ N.D, New Delhi, was dismissed for the reason that both the offences are distinct and cannot be tried jointly.
2. The FIR no. RC No. CBI/ ACU IX/ N.D. 3(A)/ 2009 under Section 7, 8, 12, r/w 13(2) PC Act & 13(1)(d) of PC Act r/w Section 120-B IPC was registered on the allegation that the petitioner had demanded and agreed to accept illegal gratification of Rs. 7 lacs, while functioning in the capacity of Member, Company Law Board. On the basis of the aforesaid FIR, searches were conducted in the residential premises of the petitioner at New Delhi and Chennai during 27.11.2009 to 1.12.2009 which led to the discovery of huge movable and immovable prop
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.