SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 107

B.N.KIRPAL, SANTOSH DUGGAL
GIAN CHAND HALWAI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. B. Ahuja, for the petitioner.
S. P. Shringi, for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following two questions for our opinion :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the 'burfee' as sold by the dealer was not 'milk product' as specified under entry 12 of the Second Schedule of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as then extended to the Union Territory of Delhi and its sale was not exempted from payment of sales tax ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that 'muthri' prepared and sold by the dealer was not 'bread' under entry 3 of the Second Schedule to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as then extended to the Union Territory of Delhi and was not exempt from payment of sales tax ?"

According to the statement of the case, the appellant carries on the business of halwai and deals in sweetmeats including burfee and namkeen including muthri, etc.

The dealer claimed that burfee was a milk product and was exempt under entry 12 of the Second Schedule appended to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as then extended to the Union Territory of Delhi and muthri













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top