SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 252

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
B.N. Kirpal, Santosh Duggal, JJ.
GHAZIABAD ENGINEERING CO. (P.) LTD.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX
S.T.R. Nos. 28 to 30 of 1977
Decided On: Decided On : 22-08-1990

Advocates Appeared:
Randhir Chawla, for the applicant.
M. K. Arora, for the respondent.

Spare parts of motor vehicles, as used in entry 1 of the First Schedule appended to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, would include only those spare parts which were used directly in motor vehicles.

Headnote:

SALES TAX - Fuel injection pump and its spare parts - Whether covered under entry 1 of the First Schedule appended to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Held, no.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a registered dealer in motor parts and agricultural implements, sold fuel injection pumps and their spare parts during the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68. The assessing authority held that the goods were spare parts of motor vehicles and subjected them to tax at 10% under the local Sales Tax Act and 3% under the Central Sales Tax Act. The assessee contended that the goods should be taxed at 5% as spare parts of diesel engines, which were taxed as a residuary item.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the fuel injection pump and its spare parts were not spare parts of motor vehicles but were parts of diesel engines. It observed that the diesel engine was a self-contained unit and that the fuel pump was an integral and necessary part of it. The court further held that the diesel engine was taxed separately under the Sales Tax Act and that, therefore, its part like a fuel pump should not be taxed at a different rate.

Issues: Whether the fuel injection pump and its spare parts were covered under entry 1 of the First Schedule appended to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as extended to the Union Territory of Delhi.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the entry "spare parts of motor vehicles" strictly and held that it would include only those spare parts which were used directly in motor vehicles. The court also applied the common parlance test and held that, in common parlance, a fuel pump would be regarded as a part of the engine and not a part of the motor vehicle.

Final Decision: The court answered the question of law referred to it by the Sales Tax Tribunal in the negative and against the Revenue.

JUDGMENT

B.N. KIRPAL, J.

In respect of the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, has referred the following questions of law to this Court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Financial Commissioner was justified in holding that the fuel injection pump and its spare parts dealt with by the applicant was covered under entry 1 of the First Schedule appended to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as then extended to the Union Territory of Delhi and was liable to tax at 10 per cent under that Act and not at 5 per cent as claimed by the applicant, and at the rate of 3 per cent under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and not 1 per cent as mentioned in Notification No. S.R.O. 2717 dated 23rd August, 1957 ?"

2. Briefly stated the facts, as per the statement of case, are that the assessee is a registered dealer which is engaged in the business of selling motor parts, tractor parts, tractors and agricultural implements. During the year 1966-67, the assessee had sold fuel injection pumps and their spare parts and the same were, as per the assessee, covered by the item of general machinery and it was liable to pay tax at 1 per cent under the Central Sales Tax Act. The assessee had been selling the goods to parties dealing in fuel injection spares required for diesel engines or to parties manufacturing diesel engines used for agricultural purposes.

3. Initially the assessee paid under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as extended to Delhi, local tax at 10 per cent treating the fuel injection pumps, etc., as spare pans of motor vehicles. Before the assessing authority, however, it was contended that payment of sales tax at 10 per cent was a mistake and the said equipment could not be regarded as spare parts of motor vehicles.

4. The assessing authority held that the goods were mostly sold to parties who dealt with motor vehicles and the goods were nothing else but motor parts though the possibility of their double use with or without slight alteration or modification was not ruled out. - The assessing authority rejected the claim that the said goods should be taxed at 5 per cent. Under the Central Sales Tax Act, by regarding the said equipment as spare parts of motor vehicles, the same was subjected to tax at 3 per cent.

5. Appeals were filed both under the Central Act as well as the local Sales Tax Act to the Assistant Commissioner but without success. Revision before the Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax was also dismissed. Second revision petition was then filed before the Financial Commissioner who observed that in the instant case it had been proved by evidence that all the sales of fuel injection pumps had been made by the assessee to the parties dealing in motor spare parts and that it had been charging tax at 10 per cent, meaning thereby that the assessee had been treating it as motor spare parts. For that reason, the revision petition was dismissed.

6. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed an application for reference to the Tribunal, who succeeded the Financial Commissioner, and the aforesaid question of law has been referred to this Court.

7. Before us two contentions have been raised by the learned counsel for the assessee. It has been submitted by Mr. Chawla that the fuel injection pump is not a spare part and is, therefore, not covered by the entry in question. In the alternative, it is submitted that even if it be held that the fuel injection pump is a spare part, then it will be a spare part of the diesel engine and not of a motor vehicle.

8. Mr. Arora, on the other hand, has submitted that the fuel injection pumps are parts of motor vehicles and have been rightly taxed at 10 per cent under the local Sales Tax Act and 3 per cent under the Central Act.

9. Before dealing with the rival contentions, it is necessary to refer to the relevant entries. Under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as extended to Union Territory of Delhi, d






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top