SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 1975

HIMA KOHLI
IN THE MATTER OF M/S HT MEDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ANAND PANDEY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Subhash Srivastava, Advocate
None.

JUDGMENT

HIMA KOHLI, J.

1. At the outset, counsel for the plaintiff submits that he proposes to confine the relief in the present suit to a decree of permanent injunction against the defendants for restraining them from using the name of the plaintiff, its employees, editors, members or any deceptive variant thereof in their advertisement material in any form.

2. The present suit has been instituted on behalf of the plaintiff company by Mr. Majoj Bhargava, A.G.M. (Legal), described as an authorized signatory of the plaintiff company, competent to sign and verify the plaint and institute and prosecute the suit. The plaintiff has filed the suit against the defendant No.2, “Poorvanchal Vishesh”, a magazine published and edited by the defendant No.1, Mr. Anand Pandey. The photocopy of the power of attorney dated 14.2.2007 executed in favour of Mr. Majoj Bhargava has been filed (marked as “A”) and the original thereof has been produced by the counsel for the plaintiff, perused by the Court and returned to him. Mr. Manoj Bhargava (PW-1) is also the deponent of the affidavit dated 23.2.2011 tendered in evidence as PW-1 and marked as Ex.PW-A. 3. It is averred in the plaint that the plaintif










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top