SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 1022

KAILASH GAMBHIR
Haryana Steel & Alloys Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Transport Corporation of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anil Grover, Adv.
Mr. T.A. Francis, Adv.

JUDGMENT

KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.

1. By this appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and decree dated 3rd February, 2005 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts Delhi whereby decreing the suit for recovery of Rs. 5,20,529/-filed by the respondent under Order XXXVII of CPC was decreed in favour of the respondent and against the appellant.

2. The main grievance raised by the appellant in the present appeal is that the recovery suit filed by the respondent was barred by the provisions of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as SICA) as no permission was sought by them under Section 22(1) of the Act before filing the said recovery suit. It is also the case of the appellant that in the leave to defend application filed by the appellant in response to the summons for judgment issued by the learned Trial Court in the said summary suit, one of the main objections, besides others, was that the appellant company was registered with the BIFR at serial No. 389/99 and, therefore, the said proceedings of the summary suit were liabl











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top