SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 1075

INDERMEET KAUR
SANT LAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJINDER KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Amit Khemka, Adv.
None.

JUDGMENT

INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

1. The impugned order dated 31.01.2012 had decreed the eviction petition filed by the landlord; the application seeking leave to defend filed by the tenant had been declined.

2. Record shows that the present eviction petition has been filed by the landlord Rajinder Kumar against his tenant Sant Lal; disputed premises are a shop forming part of property bearing No. 8489, Ward No. 15, Arya Nagar, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi measuring approximately 10”X10”; rate of rent was Rs.35/- per month excluding electricity charges. Bonafide need has been disclosed in the eviction petition as the need for the petitioner for himself as also for his daughter and his wife for the purposes of running a business; contention of the petitioner is that he is the owner and landlord of the aforenoted premises; he had purchased it from Ram Devi wife of Ram Chander vide document dated 13.10.1986 and since then the tenant has attorned to him and has been paying rent to him; the plaintiff has two sons and two daughters one of whom is unmarried. His elder son Akash is running a general store from the back portion of the property No. 8489, Arya Nagar, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi. The petiti


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top