SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 795

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
O. P. AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
AKSHAY LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. O.P. Aggarwal, Advocate.
Mr. Atar Singh Tokas, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. The appellant No.1, who is an Advocate, states that he has informed Mr. Atar Singh Tokas, counsel for the respondents, and Mr. Tokas informed him that the respondents have taken back the file from him. I am not inclined to adjourn this old appeal any further as this matter is on the Regular Board of this Court since 2.2.2012.

2. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal(RFA) filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 13.12.2003 dismissing the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs for possession and mesne profits with respect to the suit property bearing MCD No.500/23, Plot No.29, Gali No.10, Bhikam Singh Colony, Behind Masjid, Shahdara, Delhi.

3. The facts of this case are that the appellants/plaintiffs by means of usual documents being the Agreement to Sell, Power of Attorney, Will etc all dated 11.2.2002(Power of Attorney and Will being duly registered with the sub-Registrar, Delhi) purchased the rights in the suit property from one Sh. Sadat Ali Khan. Sh. Sadat Ali Khan had purchased the suit property from Smt. Jasbeer Kaur by means of similar set of












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top