SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 1989

M.L.MEHTA
JAWAHAR LAL – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDER KUMAR KHANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajat Taneja, Mr. Vaibhav, Advocates.
Mr. Manohar Lal, Adv. for R1.

JUDGMENT

M.L. MEHTA, J.

1. This revision petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short the “Act”) assails the order dated 14.03.2012 of Additional Rent Controller (ARC), North whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner in the eviction petition filed against him by the respondents, was dismissed and an eviction order was passed.


2. The petitioner is a tenant under the respondents in respect of the two rooms in property bearing No. 96, First Floor, Khurshid Market, Sadar Bazar, Delhi. His eviction is sought by the respondent No. 1 on the ground of bona fide requirement thereof by him for setting up his business of hosiery for his son, who had got a degree of Bachelor of Business Administration in 2006, alleging not to be having any other reasonably suitable commercial space for this purpose. It is averred by the respondent No.1/landlord in the eviction petition that since despite best efforts, his son has not been able to get a good job, he required the tenanted premises to get him established in the hosiery business.

3. The petitioner filed leave to defend application alleging the respondents to be in possession of various oth















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top