SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 861

G.P.MITTAL
RAMPATI – Appellant
Versus
SHYAMBEER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv.
Mr. K.K. Bhat, Adv. for R-3.

JUDGMENT

G.P. MITTAL, J.

1. These two Appeals arise out of a judgment dated 22.07.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `17,33,750/- was awarded for the death of Shrichand, who died in a motor accident which occurred on 26.12.2005.

2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal it was claimed that the deceased was 50 years of age. He was earning ` 42,000/- per month from doing the job of a building contractor. The Claim Petition was filed by the widow and three major sons of the deceased.

3. In the absence of any reliable evidence as to the deceased’s income, the Claims Tribunal ventured to make a guess work to assume the deceased’s income to be `1,95,000/- (post tax), deducted one-fourth towards the personal and living expenses and applied the multiplier of ‘11’ suitable to the deceased’s age.

4. The Claims Tribunal further awarded a sum of `1,00,000/- towards loss of Love and Affection.

5. In MAC APP.841/2010 preferred by the New India Assurance Company Limited (Insurance Company) the ground of challenge is that the Appellant Insurance Company was liable to be absolved of the liability as the driver did not possess a valid d












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top