SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 867

S.MURALIDHAR
Ved Vrat Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Auto Needs (I) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Plaintiff:Ramesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Defendant:Sanat Kumar, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. The Plaintiff, Mr. Ved Vrat Sharma, has filed the present suit against the Defendant, Auto Needs (I) Private Limited, seeking possession of the industrial plot bearing No. 507, Patparganj Industrial Area, Delhi – 110 092 (‘the suit property’) including the basement admeasuring 2500 sq. ft and ground floor admeasuring 2300 sq. ft, as shown in red colour in the site plan. He has further sought a decree in the sum of Rs.11,79,780/- as arrears of rent and service tax thereon from 1st September 2008 to 31st March 2009, pendente lite and future interest @ 18% per annum and a decree in the sum of Rs.3,30,900/- as damages/mesne profits for the month of April 2009, pendente lite interest and future damages including service tax on Rs.3,30,900/-from the date of filing of the suit till such date that the Defendant vacates and hands over the peaceful possession of the suit property, and a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the Defendant, their directors, agents, servants or any one acting for and on their behalf from sub-letting, assigning or parting with possession of the suit property in favour of the third party and to award costs.

2. The case of the Plaintiff is that h





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top