SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 1113

High Court of Delhi
KAILASH GAMBHIR & INDERMEET KAUR
Moinuddin
Versus
State
Crl.A. 1122 of 2010
Decided On : 04-09-2013

Appearing Advocates:
For the Appellant:Vivek Sood, Ms. Janhavi Mahana, V.P. Singh, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor with Inspector Binay Singh from Police Station Hazarat Nizzamuddin.

The judgment establishes the importance of circumstantial evidence, the last seen theory, and the recovery of the weapon of offence in proving guilt in a murder case.

Headnote:

Criminal Law - Murder - IPC Section 302, IPC Section 201 - The judgment discusses the circumstantial evidence, last seen theory, and the recovery of the weapon of offence. The court found the accused guilty of the murder of the deceased based on the established links in the chain of evidence.

Fact of the Case:

The dead body of the deceased was found in Kusro Park, New Delhi. The deceased's wife, Rubina, identified the body and suspected Moinuddin to be the culprit. The post-mortem revealed multiple injuries, and the accused was arrested with a blood-stained knife, purchased a day before the incident.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty of the murder based on the last seen theory, the recovery of the weapon of offence, and the circumstantial evidence. The court rejected the defense's arguments and upheld the conviction.

Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of witness testimonies, the accuracy of the register entries, and the defense's claims of false implication and lack of evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of considering the cumulative evidence, including witness testimonies, recovery of the weapon, and the accused's conduct. The court also highlighted the significance of the last seen theory in establishing guilt.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction of the accused under IPC Section 302 and IPC Section 201.

Judgment :

Indermeet Kaur, J.

1. On 11.09.2006 dead body of Ashraf Ali @ Munna was found in Kusro Park, Hazarat Nizamudin, New Delhi within the jurisdiction of Police Station Hazarat Nizamudin. This body had been located by beat constable Pramod (PW-9); time was 10:15 AM. Information was sent to the local police station which was documented vide DD No. 6-A (Ex.PW-22/A).

2. ASI Jeet Singh (PW-19) accompanied with constable Dharampal reached the spot; blood was found lying on the spot; a male human dead body about 15-20 steps away from the entrance was found lying in the bushes. Cut wounds were noted on the neck as also on the stomach of the deceased. The deceased was wearing a grey coloured T-shirt and an orange colour legging. A pair of spectacles was lying near the dead body; so also a key ring having a brass plate upon which was inscribed with “room No. 8, Haji Guest House”.

3. Inspector H.C. Verma (PW-22) also reached the spot. In the course of inquiry made from room No. 8 of “Haji Guest House”, it was revealed that a couple by the name of Ashraf along with his wife Rubina was occupying room No. 8 of the said guest house since 11.09.2006; they were residents of Bombay. PW-19 on reaching the guest house found the room locked from inside. On opening the door Rubina (PW-8) was found in the room. She disclosed that she had been married to the deceased in the year 1992 and she along with her husband had come to Delhi on 11.09.2006 and was since staying in room No. 8 of “Haji Guest House” On 16.09.2006 (fateful day of the incident) she along with her husband had come out of the guest house at about 06:00-06:15 AM when she noted that Moinuddin (resident of her village) was standing there. Moinuddin invited her husband to have tea with him; PW-8 did not want her husband to stay back with Moinuddin but she since she had to meet her brother-in-law and her sister who was not well, she left her husband in the company of Moinuddin and went to meet her sister. She returned back at 01:00 PM where the Manager met her and asked her to accompany her to Khusro Park where on reaching there she found the dead body of her husband. A pair of spectacles and a bunch of key were lying near the body. She suspected Moinuddin to be the culprit and informed the police; she also handed over a letter (Ex.PW-8/B) purportedly written in hand by Moinuddin to her which revealed a passionate infatuation and a one sided love by Moinuddin for PW-8 to which she had never responded. Further testimony of PW-8 being that Moinuddin was offended by her this non-responsive attitude and threatened her that he would not allow her to live with anyone else but with him. Ex.PW-8/B was handed over by PW-8 to the police.

4. Post mortem of the deceased was conducted on 19.09.2006 by Dr Bharat Verma (PW-15). The following four injuries were noted on his body:-

“1.Cut throat wound present over the lower half of the neck measuring 8 cm x 5 cm bone deep oval shape measuring 41 cm in circumference.

2. Stab wound present over the upper half of abdomen triangular shape with base upwards measuring 6 cm x 2 cm x viscra deep with a part of intestine exuding out of the wound.

3. Incised wound measuring 3cm x0.5 cm x skin deep present over the index figure right hand.

4. Incised wound measuring 2 cm x0.5cm x skin deep present over the middle finger right hand.”

They were opined to be ante mortem. The following four internal injuries were also noted:-

“1. Skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscles, thyroid, larnyx and trachcal rings damaged as a result of injury no.1.

2. Perforating wound, through and through present over heart 100 ml of fluid blood present in the cavity.

3. Jugular veins and carotid arteries damages as a result of injury no.1.

4. Stab wound measuring 6cm x 2cm x 0.5cm present over the anterior aspect of liver, extension of injury no.2.”

Cause of Death:-

The cause of death in this case was shock as a result of haemorrhage due to multiple injuries. All injuries are ante mort



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top