KAILASH GAMBHIR, INDERMEET KAUR
Atender Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Kailash Gambhir, J.
1. By this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) the appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 20.09.2010 and 23.09.2010 respectively passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, West Distt., Delhi, thereby convicting the appellant for committing an offence under Section 376(2) (f) of India Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default thereof to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of three months.
2. The case of the prosecution in the brief is that:
“On 30.05.2007, on receipt of DD No.24, ASI Harpal Singh reached PS Pashchim Vihar, where HC Ranjeet Singh Ct. Satish Kumar PP Madipur met him. ASI Joginder Singh produced Prosecutrix aged 11 years, the daughter of the accused. ASI Harpal Singh made inquiries from Prosecutrix who stated that the accused had raped her in November and December 2006. Prosecutrix along with her mother Geeta Anand were taken to Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital (hereinafter “SGM Hospitai”) where she was medically examined.
Tameezuddin @ Tammu vs. State of (NCT) of Delhi reported in (2009)15 SCC 566
Rajoo and Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in AIR 2009 SC 858
Lillu @ Rajesh and Anr. vs. State of Haryana
Suryanarayan Raina v. State of Karnataka reported in 2001 (9) SCC 129
Bhupinder Sharma vs. State of Himachal Pradesh AIR 2003 SC 4684
State vs. Jain Hind 2012(4) JCC 2490
Pushpanjali Sahu vs. State of Orissa & Anr. AIR 2013 SC 1119
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.