SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 1292

MANMOHAN SINGH
Devender Nath – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Asim – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K.R. Chawla, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sanjay Verma, Ms. Savita, Advocates.

Judgment :

Manmohan Singh, J.

1. The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the eviction order dated 10th July, 2012 passed by ARC (North), Delhi, in respect of the property bearing No.1439, Chatta Abdul Razaq, Lambi Gali, Behind Novelty Cinema, Delhi- 110006 (hereinafter referred to as “the tenanted premises”).

2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petition are that the respondent filed the eviction petition stating that he bonafidely requires the tenanted premises mainly, for his son, who is about to finish his education, and also for expansion of his own business of footwear.

3. It is pertinent to mention that in the eviction petition, the summons were issued under the schedule III of the DRC Act by way of registered AD and the ordinary post but the summons were received by some Mr. Ajeet who was the employee of the petitioner and the said service was accepted by the learned RC as service on the petitioner. The petitioner has stated that due to non service of summons on him, the leave to defend application could not be filed by him within the s


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top